MR Work Meetings vs In-Person Work Meetings

August 17, 2021

Introduction

With the rise of technology, we are moving towards a world that encompasses digital and virtual aspects in various spheres of our lives. One such sphere is the workspace, where we have seen a significant shift towards remote working and virtual meetings. Mixed reality (MR) technology has emerged as an exciting solution for conducting virtual meetings that simulate the in-person experience.

In this blog post, we will be comparing MR work meetings and in-person work meetings, considering the pros and cons of both to help you decide which one will fit your needs best.

MR Work Meetings

Mixed reality technology has been around for a few years now, but it's only taking off in the business world recently. MR can be defined as a combination of virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR), generating a world that blends digital and physical elements.

MR work meetings are becoming increasingly popular as they provide a way for remote teams to interact as if they were in the same room. With MR technology, you can present your ideas to your team using 3D models, videos, and even holograms. This way, everyone can visualise and understand the presented material better.

Moreover, MR technology provides an immersive experience that helps in building a stronger connection among team members. It also eliminates the need for travel, saving both time and resources. According to a study conducted by HP, 71% of workers preferred remote collaboration over in-person collaboration, citing the time-saving benefits.

However, MR technology is still emerging, and some challenges need to be addressed. MR platforms require headsets, a stable high-speed internet connection, and a workspace that supports such technology. Additionally, MR work meetings require more focus and attention, and some individuals might experience motion sickness.

In-Person Work Meetings

In-person work meetings have been the norm for centuries, and they offer several benefits that MR work meetings might lack. The most significant advantage is the ability to read body language, which is essential for building rapport, developing trust, and avoiding misunderstandings.

Moreover, in-person meetings create a conducive environment that stimulates creativity, which is essential for brainstorming and problem-solving. This is especially true when members of a team come from different backgrounds or have contrasting opinions.

However, in-person work meetings have some disadvantages. First, they require travel, which can be time-consuming and expensive. Second, not everyone can attend, especially if they are located far away or face mobility issues.

Conclusion

In conclusion, both MR work meetings and in-person work meetings offer several advantages and disadvantages. MR work meetings provide the convenience of remote collaboration, cost and time-saving benefits, while in-person work meetings offer the opportunity to read body language, stimulate creativity and build rapport.

The decision of which type of work meeting to choose ultimately depends on the nature of the meeting, the needs of the participants and the available resources. However, with the growth of MR technology, we can expect MR work meetings to become more mainstream and to evolve more in the future.

References


© 2023 Flare Compare